Saturday, March 30, 2013

Digital Disruption



Even in the field of investment advice the supply chain is being disrupted: Aivars Lode Avantce

By Andrew Osterland
January 20, 2013 12:01 am ET

Internet-based advisory firms aren't much of a concern for most traditional fee-based financial advisers.
But they are for Ric Edelman.
The chief executive of The Edelman Financial Group, which manages more than $9 billion in assets, thinks that technology platforms offering financial advice could become the preferred option for younger Americans who eventually will inherit trillions of dollars from their baby boomer parents.
Equally scary is the possibility that as the digital platforms improve, they will attract more high-net-worth clients who sustain the thousands of fee-based advisers across the country.
Research from consulting firms such as Cerulli Associates Inc. suggests that wealthier investors already have diverted a significant amount of assets to low-cost, self-directed accounts since the financial crisis.
The proliferation of online investment services firms has been staggering.
Two years ago,
Grant Easterbrook, an analyst with consulting firm Corporate Insight, reported on five online startup firms offering different levels of investment management or financial planning services. His latest assessment covers 37 such outfits.
“The services these firms provide range from investment advice based on algorithms to low-cost online financial advisers focused on either investment selection or financial planning. Their fees are cut-rate,” Mr. Easterbrook said.
While few online outfits manage more than $100 million in assets, and most serve small investors who aren't very profitable for traditional advisers, Mr. Edelman believes the technology they use will have a profound impact on his practice and the entire advisory industry.
WHO IS BEING SERVED?
“This is the direction the world is moving, and we're at the beginning stages of it,” Mr. Edelman said. “Technological advances in the next three to five years will have a radical, disruptive impact on financial advice and how it's delivered.”
Attracted by a relatively low $50,000 client minimum, so-called mass-affluent investors have been advisory clients of Mr. Edelman's for a long time. On Jan. 7, however, he opened his doors to all comers, lowering his firm's investible assets threshold to just $5,000.
His plan is to deliver his services to these low-end customers via a revamped Edelman Online platform he says offers the firm's investment management services without human intervention, though all clients will have access to an adviser if they wish.
Mr. Edelman calls it a long-term loyalty program. “When these customers earn more money and receive their inheritances, they'll give it to me to manage,” he said.
Many of his peers think he's wasting his time and money targeting less affluent investors, but Bill Winterberg, founder of FPPad, a technology consulting firm for financial advisers, thinks it's worth the risk.
In fact, firms that don't prepare for the change run the bigger risk, Mr. Winterberg said. “Those who choose not to serve up-and-coming clients will miss the opportunity.”
Conventional wisdom, however, suggests the opportunity isn't much to miss. Numerous studies of lower-asset advisory clients indicate that they rarely evolve into bigger, wealthier ones. Bank of America Merrill Lynch research showed that the asset levels of 92% of small clients remained about the same after a two-year period. The company cited the findings when it announced early last year that it was reducing payouts to advisers on clients with under $250,000 in assets.
Wirehouses as a group continue to push advisers to shed smaller clients, but they're not ignoring them entirely. Merrill Lynch, for example, wants to serve clients with less than $250,000 — but on its Internet-based Merrill Edge platform, which had $75.9 billion in assets as of Sept. 30.
The optimistic view of low-cost tech offerings is that they are simply expanding the market for financial advice, reaching customers not currently served. A Society of Actuaries study in 2009 found that there were 14.9 million households in what they term the middle mass market between the ages of 55 and 74. With median net worth ranging from $111,000 to $348,000 depending on age and marital status, most of these pre-retirees and early retirees are not receiving financial advice, according to Betty Meredith, director of education and research for the International Foundation for Retirement Education.
Jude Boudreaux, a financial adviser whose company, Upperline Financial Planning Inc., has no minimum asset threshold for clients, believes the growth of online advice platforms is positive for the industry.
“We need more ways for non-high-net-worth people to access professional advice and technology,” Mr. Boudreaux said. “I don't think it's a danger to the industry. Technology will never replace what a true financial planner does.”
The more ominous possibility is that technology could undermine the economics of the advice industry just as discount brokers did to the brokerage industry and exchange-traded funds are doing to the asset management industry.
The marketing message of these online upstarts is easy enough to understand. “We're for the mass- affluent investor and anyone else smart enough not to want to spend 2% of their assets on a financial adviser,” said Jonathan Stein, chief executive of Betterment LLC. Mr. Stein's firm, founded in 2011, serves investors online and charges as little as 15 basis points.
It asks customers a series of questions and recommends simple portfolios of stocks and bonds, depending on the answers. The portfolios can be automatically re-balanced for a little extra. The company doesn't offer tax and estate planning or insurance, nor does it advise on philanthropic activities or the like — largely because most of Betterment's clients don't have those challenges.
"ROBO-ADVISERS'
That's not financial planning, said Michael Kitces, partner and director of research at Pinnacle Advisory Group Inc. He calls firms such as Betterment and FutureAdviser “robo-advisers” and doesn't consider them a threat to true financial planners.
“They do what Vanguard and Schwab do. They're just $2 trillion in assets behind them,” he said.
He sees a more substantial challenge from companies such as Personal Capital, a firm led by former Intuit CEO Bill Harris, and Learnvest, a website initially catering to women that offers financial plans for a flat fee but doesn't manage money. Both firms have increasingly elegant analytical tools and have hired dozens of certified financial planners.
“Financial planning done badly will be under siege by firms like these,” Mr. Kitces said. “If you only deliver passive portfolio design and management to your clients, these business models will take you down.”


Folks are lining up around the block to lose money


The numbers say it all commerce is here to stay! Aivars lode Avantce

Folks are lining up around the block to lose money
Saturday, February 2, 2013
 There are times to be bullish, and there are times to be cautious (or even bearish).

And just about nobody ever gets them right.

For example, in early 2009, after the market plunged more than 50% from its 2007 highs, nobody was bullish – even though it was the perfect moment to buy.

And if investors knew that they should become more bullish as stock prices fell and less bullish as they rose, we could have avoided a situation like we faced in 2009, when the S&P 500 traded for 13 times earnings.

The stock market went up almost 20% in 2009. It's gone up every year since, including last year's 13% rise. So folks now are bullish, with the American Association of Individual Investors Sentiment Survey showing 52% of respondents bullish on stocks for the next six months. Historically, anything above 50% is getting into extreme territory. Less than 19% were bullish the week ending March 5, 2009, the day before the S&P 500 officially bottomed.

The mistake is obvious. The herd thinks whatever just happened will happen again soon. It's called "recency bias." It assumes the most recent data is the most important data. In the stock market, recency bias is closely aligned with availability bias. That's when you think the most readily available data is the most important data.

Price quotes are the most readily available data about public companies. So putting our two biases together, the most recent price-quote history is irresistible to the vast, thundering herd of investors.

And now, after four years of stock market gains, all anyone can see in the rearview mirror is a rising market… so that's the overwhelmingly popular expectation.

Everyone wants to buy. Everyone wants to take more risk. "Junk" bond yields dipped below 6% for the first time in history this month. (Earlier this week, Steve Sjuggerud – one of the best contrarians I know – told DailyWealth readers that it's time to sell junk bonds.)

I'm not delusional enough to try to call a top in the market. To believe that is to remain under the spell of recent price quotes. I'm just saying if all you know is price quotes – and that's all most investors know – you're going to lose money… and from the looks of things today, it looks like folks are lined up around the block to lose money in stocks once again.

 One of the biggest trends in the market today is the decimation of brick-and-mortar retailers by e-commerce.

Arguably the most visible bankruptcy resulting from this trend is book retailer Borders. Electronics retailer Circuit City also shuttered in large part due to Internet competition. Circuit City's main rival, Best Buy, is also hemorrhaging sales and clients… And the company's founder is considering taking the company private.

 If you had to pick one company that's done the most to hasten the demise of brick-and-mortar retailers… it would be the world's largest online retailer, Amazon. Take a look at this chart of Amazon's sales versus the sales for the Morgan Stanley Retail Index (an index of 31 national retailers).



Barnes and Noble's hardest lesson: It pays to be small



The internet continues to change the face of retailing. Aivars Lode Avantce

Barnes and Noble's hardest lesson: It pays to be small
By Nin-Hai Tseng, Writer January 29, 2013: 3:33 PM ET

Barnes & Noble has struggled to keep up with the growth of digital books, but that's not the only hurdle it faces. We just want stores to be smaller now.

FORTUNE -- Barnes & Noble expects to close up to a third of its retail book stores over the next decade, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday. The closures seem inevitable. Like other retailers, the chain has struggled in a digital world, where readers increasingly turned to e-books and online discounts. Its savior is arguably its Nook products, but sales during the holiday season fell from a year earlier amid competition from the likes of Amazon,Apple, and Google.
Indeed, it's hard to run a bookstore in the Internet age, but new technology is only part of Barnes & Noble's (BKS) problems. Its stores simply got too big in a nation that increasingly prefers things -- well, smaller.
Since the financial crisis, Americans have warmed to smaller sizes in everything from cars to homes. Even massive Wal-Mart stores (WMT) have downsized. In 1962, the world's biggest retailer opened discount stores averaging 108,000 square feet, says Ed McMahon, senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute. By 1988, Wal-Mart unveiled its Supercenters, averaging 185,000 square feet. But a decade later it opened its Neighborhood markets, which, at an average of 42,000 square feet, was more than two times smaller than its Supercenters. The chain went even smaller in 2011, with its Express stores averaging 15,000 square feet.
The big box trend coincided with what many other retailers did as America's middle class left cities for the suburbs. Between 1960 and 2000, retail space rose ten fold -- growing from 4 to 38 square feet per person, McMahon says. Retail space grew five times faster than retail sales. The financial crisis put an abrupt end to that expansion. There is now more than 1 billion square feet of vacant retail space, mostly where big box retailers once did business.
MORE: Time for Samsung's next act
Beyond Wal-Mart, going small is being driven by several factors - some related, others unrelated: People are getting married later; U.S. cities are growing faster than suburbs for the first time in decades; the remaining suburbs, filled with sleepy strip commercial centers, are being turned into walkable urban places.
Of course, the Internet has played a big role in shrinking physical stores as well. Just as superstores put many local stores out of business, online shopping is hurting big box retailers, McMahon says.
But some local stores that managed to stick around are now thriving again. This is perhaps most evident in the market for books. In the years where big-box chains saw bankruptcies and store closures, the number of independents have generally stayed steady during the past few years. The American Booksellers Association, a trade organization that supports independents says that since the depths of the Great Recession, it has had roughly the same number of members -- 1,524 in 2008 to 1,567 in 2012. Stores did indeed close during those years with few if any new openings, but in 2009, new ones sprung up. Last year, 40 opened nationwide.
That's far fewer than Barnes & Noble, which until 2009 opened 30 or more a year. But the fact that any indie stores are opening at a time when big-box chains are closing says a lot about being small and local.
This isn't to say independents haven't struggled. In November 2011, best-selling novelist Anne Patchett opened Parnassus Books in her hometown, Nashville, TN. When a local bookstore closed and the area lost another one due to the Borders bankruptcy, Patchett partnered with Karen Hayes, a native who left her job in sales at Random House. The closings left a void in the area that's also home to Vanderbilt University, a literary community.
Parnassus filled it, but not all communities may be lucky enough to have an Anne Patchett around.



Office Depot debuts 'interactive' store, as merger rumors boosts stock



Brick and mortar business continue to have to transforn themselves due to the internets continued  business model disruption. Aivars Lode Avantce

Office Depot debuts 'interactive' store, as merger rumors boosts stock
By Marcia Heroux Pounds, Staff Writer
6:07 p.m. EST, February 8, 2013
Savvy customers sip on coffee while surrounded by the latest gadgets. They surf the Internet on laptops or tablets, check out some new headphones or ponder their next electronic purchases in a soothing, relaxed manner.
Office Depot's new "interactive'' stores are a little Apple-like, a little Starbucks-like. The stores still will sell basic office supplies and provide copy and print services for small businesses, but now it comes with a twist, a bit of modernization and hip as the company gets away from its old big-box mentality.
The new versions are already in six states and will be rolled out in Florida and elsewhere later this year as the office-supply giant trends toward smaller-format stores.
"We're looking at drawing traffic and new customers," said Juan Guerrero, senior vice president of Office Depot's North American retail division. The store is trying to attract the 18- to 35-year-old population — not the typical Office Depot shopper. Most current customers are small-business owners or mothers shopping for school supplies for their kids.
Office Depot's latest retail concept caps more than two years of initiatives to turn around the company in a difficult economic environment. The initial phase, introduced in 2011, was to reduce store sizes. The average 23,000-square-foot store is being reduced to units more like 5,000 to 15,000 square feet.
The idea is to attract new customers and inject some excitement into Office Depot stores, which customer surveys revealed were "somewhat clinical and cold," Guerrero said.
While some analysts cast doubt on a younger demographic shopping at Office Depot, most say the smaller-store strategy is beginning to work.
Major stockholder Starboard Value LP could force a bolder move, a merger with rival OfficeMax. The industry is ripe for consolidation, with both retailers smaller than Staples, which leads in sales and profitability, analysts say.
Starboard Value, an activist shareholder that holds nearly 15 percent of Office Depot's stock, may seek seats on the company's board this spring at the company's annual meeting. Speculation of industry consolidation pumped some life into the stock, now over $4 a share, though still down nearly 70 percent from five years ago.
"If Office Depot can turn things around, [Starboard Value] is going to be happy. If that doesn't happen, they may have to do an OfficeMax deal," said Anthony Chukumba, analyst with BB&T Capital Markets.
Starboard has retained former Home Depot CEO Bob Nardelli and former Staples executive Joe Vassalluzzo as consultants, according to a securities filing.
When comparing the rival office-supply stores, "Office Depot is clearly ahead of OfficeMax in terms of small-format stores," said Chukumba, whose firm buys and sells both stocks.
Office Depot already is investing more than $60 million a year reducing its store count, with plans to downsize or relocate 500 stores — nearly half its U.S. outlets over the next five years.
OfficeMax also plans to debut a new, smaller store format this spring, comparable in size to the Office Depot transformations, said Nicole Miller, spokeswoman for the Naperville, Ill.,-based retailer.
"The goal is to focus on innovation and roll it out gradually," she said.
But a merger?
OfficeMax "has a long-standing policy that we do not comment on market rumors or speculation," Miller said.
Morningstar analyst Liang Feng said while Starboard may seek a seat on Office Depot's board, the power still rests with BC Partners, which holds three seats whose directors are contractually obligated to vote with Office Depot management. In 2009, Office Depot sold a 20 percent stake in the company for a $350 million investment.
Chief Executive Neil Austrian has said the company's strategies to shrink stores and increase profits are paying off. Austrian was not available to address recent company issues or plans, spokesman Brian Levine said.
Office supplies continue to be a tough sector. Office Depot's sales decreased 5 percent in its latest quarter, compared to same period in 2011. And during an investor presentation in November, Office Depot forecasts annual sales to be down by 3 percent in 2013, down 1 percent in 2014, and flat in 2015.
If Office Depot and OfficeMax did merge, they would face significant costs. BB&T estimates the companies would have to spend $300 million to $500 million to close 200 North American stores.
Yet savings from a merger also could be significant, according to Goldman Sachs, with lower costs for purchasing and distribution, advertising, and general and administrative expenses.
Another hurdle would be the Justice Department, which could have antitrust concerns.
If a merger is proposed, it would go before the federal official who once denied Staples' proposed acquisition of Office Depot. Former Federal Trade Commission official William Baer was recently confirmed to head the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division.




Meet Amancio Ortega: The third-richest man in the world


The third richest man in the world who you will not have heard of attributes his logistics department as the essence of his business.  Aivars Lode Avantce


Meet Amancio Ortega: The third-richest man in the world
January 8, 2013: 5:00 AM ET

After Gates and Slim comes Amancio Ortega, who built the world's largest fashion empire, Zara. He's difficult to know, impossible to interview, and incredibly secretive. An exclusive portrait.
By Vivienne Walt, contributor

Zara founder Amancio Ortega
FORTUNE -- The motorbike roared up to the traffic light in La Coruña in northern Spain and stopped alongside a black Town Car. From inside, the passenger glanced out his window and saw the young biker leaning over the handlebars, jean jacket decorated with appliquéd patches, a throwback to the 1970s. The man in the car, decades older than the biker, zoomed in on the jacket. The old man grabbed his cellphone and, as the story goes, called an aide in his office. His eyes still fixed on the biker, the man described the jacket's stitching, its shape and color, and signed off with a single instruction: "¡Hácedla!" Make it.
The light turned green, the biker pulled away; unbeknown to him, he and his jacket had just played a walk-on role in one of the greatest retail stories of our time.
Amancio Ortega Gaona -- the man inside the car -- is the third-richest man on earth. In this provincial corner of Galicia, on Spain's windswept northwestern coastline, the 76-year-old founder of the Inditex Group has spent years secluded from public view, all while living in the middle of La Coruña, a city of 246,000 people. Among the millions of shoppers who patronize Inditex's flagship brand, Zara, and have made Ortega unfathomably rich, few have even heard his name. Ortega has made sure of that, shunning social appearances and refusing all interview requests (including for this article). Until 1999 no photograph of Ortega had ever been published.
MORE: Will.i.am: Corporate America's hit machine
And yet, a world away from the glitz of Paris, Milan, and New York, Ortega has built a fashion empire that reaches into more than 80 countries. Beginning 40 years ago, Ortega ripped up the business model that had been refined over decades by Europe's fashion houses and replaced it with one of the most brutally fast turnaround schedules the industry had ever attempted. Decades later Zara is the world's biggest fashion retailer.
Ortega built his empire on two basic rules: Give customers what they want, and get it to them faster than anyone else. The twin organizing principles have made the company (and Ortega) into an unlikely iconoclast, more of an optimal supply chain than a traditional retailer. They are also the secret to Inditex's astonishing success. "Very few companies can challenge Inditex at this time. The company is in a race with themselves rather than anything else," says Christodoulos Chaviaras, a retail analyst at Barclays Capital in London. Tadashi Yanai, founder of clothing retailer Uniqlo, has made it his stated goal in life to beat Zara. And last August shares of the fashion company Esprit rose 28% on the day it announced its new CEO, Inditex's former distribution and operations manager.

Humble beginnings: Ortega grew up in a row house in La Coruña, in northern Spain (top); his first job was in retail, at Gala (left), where current owner José Martínez (right) was his friend.
Spain might be suffering through its worst recession in generations, with 24% unemployment and crippling debt, but within Inditex, the crisis might as well be happening on Mars. "They live in a different world," says Modesto Lomba, president of the Spanish Association of Fashion Designers. In December, CEO Pablo Isla announced that revenue was up 17% year on year for the first three quarters of 2012 -- that nine-month sales revenue amounts to $14.6 billion -- and net profits matched 2010's, at $2.71 billion. So far, the growth shows no signs of slowing.
Inditex produced 835,000 garments in 2011. A new Zara store opens every day, on average; Inditex's 6,000th store just launched on London's Oxford Street. There are 46 Zara stores in the U.S., 347 in China, and 1,938 in Spain. Ortega controls more than 59% of the company's shares, and last July he overtook Warren Buffett to become the world's third-richest man, behind Carlos Slim Helú and Bill Gates. The reclusive, enigmatic Spaniard, hunting for ideas from his car window on the streets of his hometown, is now worth about $56 billion.
MORE: Jeff Bezos' fashion foray
If such a fortune seems big, it is even more astonishing when you consider the man himself. The youngest of four children, Ortega was born in Busdongo de Arbas, a hamlet of 60 people in northern Spain, in 1936, just as the Spanish Civil War was erupting. The family scraped by on his father's railway job while his mother worked as a housemaid. When Amancio was a small boy, the family moved to La Coruña. There, home was a row house that abutted the train tracks and that served, as it still does today, as the railway workers' quarters. Amancio might have joined the rail service too, had it not been for one fateful evening when he was just 13. Walking home from his school, he and his mother stopped at a local store, where he stood by as his mother pleaded for credit. "He heard someone say, 'Señora, I cannot give this to you. You have to pay for it,'" says Covadonga O'Shea, a longtime friend of Ortega's who runs a fashion business school at the University of Navarra in Madrid and wrote the sole authorized biography of him, The Man From Zara. "He felt so humiliated, he decided he would never go back to school."
Barely in his teens, Ortega found a job as a shop hand for a local shirtmaker called Gala, which still sits on the same corner in downtown La Coruña. Today the store feels frozen in time: plaid shirts, fishermen's caps, and woolen cardigans. "Can you believe it?" says Xabier R. Blanco, a local journalist who tracks Ortega's career. "They still sell the same stuff, and Amancio is Mr. World." That painful irony is not lost on Gala's owner, José Martínez, 76, who inherited the store from his father. He befriended young Amancio when they were both 14. The boys spent their afternoons folding shirts at Gala and riding bikes around town. Martínez does not relish his current role as counterpoint to his childhood friend. "No one ever comes in here to buy anything," he says. "They just want to know about Amancio."

By 16, Ortega had concluded that the real money could be made giving customers exactly what they wanted, quickly, rather than buying up inventory in the hopes it would sell. To do that, he needed to figure out what people were looking for, then make it. He would need to control the supply chain. Ortega had the ideal environment: Galicia. With few job opportunities, thousands of men worked at sea, leaving their women to struggle alone back home. "The women would do anything for a little money, and they were really good at sewing," says Blanco, who co-wrote a book called Amancio Ortega: From Zero to Zara. Ortega began organizing thousands of women into sewing cooperatives. He oversaw a thriving production of quilted bathrobes for his first company, GOA. Mercedes López was 14 when she went to work for Ortega and says most women were thrilled to be hired. "The conditions were really pretty good," says López, now 52, who is the textile union representative at Inditex. "We knew Amancio well. He was very close to the workers." It was a family business: Ortega ran design, his brother Antonio headed the commercial side, and his sister Josefa was the bookkeeper. The company trucked in textiles from Barcelona, cutting out the middlemen.
With enough cash, Ortega opened his first storefront in 1975, two blocks from his teenage job at Gala. He named it Zara, because his preferred name, Zorba, was taken. From the outset, Ortega made speed the driving force. Decades later it still is. Zara stores refresh their stock twice a week and receive orders within 48 hours, tops. Ortega imposed the 48-hour rule in the 1970s, forcing him to open the first Zara stores near La Coruña. Many lined the well-traveled truck route to Barcelona's textile factories. Even as the company grew, Ortega stuck to his two rules.
MORE: Turning fashion video into a money-maker
It took Ortega 10 years to found the holding company, Inditex, and open his first international store in Portugal -- whose labor force, cheaper than Spain's, made it the next obvious place to produce; New York and Paris followed in the late 1980s. While Zara proliferated across Europe through the 1990s, much of the production was kept close to home. "Our roots have always been in manufacturing," says Jesús Echevarria Hernández, Inditex's spokesman, sitting in the company's sprawling headquarters in Arteixo, outside La Coruña, with floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking farmland. "When we come here, we always refer to it as 'going to the factory.'"
The factory is part sci-fi machine, part old-fashioned retail -- a well-oiled operation organized around Ortega's twin principles. It is restocking continually at top speed. Inside, its high-gloss, white, minimalist interiors resemble a humongous Zara store. Along two arteries down the main floor, hundreds of designers and sales analysts work at long white counters in a vast open space, grouped around regions of Zara's empire. The pace is frantic: Designers create about three items a day, and patternmakers cut one sample from each. Seated alongside them are commercial-sales specialists, each with regional expertise, who dissect tastes and customer habits using sales reports from Zara store managers to see what's selling and (more telling) what customers are looking for. Staffers say inspiration comes from the streets, clubs, bars, and restaurants. Each is trained to keep an eye on what people are wearing, just as Ortega has done for decades.

The billionare now: As the semiretired founder of Zara, Ortega lives out of a seaside multibuilding residence; he and his daughter enjoy horseracing; a Zara store in his hometown.
At one end of the Zara design floor is a small team that manages Zara.com. There, flat-screen monitors linked by webcam to offices in Shanghai, Tokyo, and New York act as trendspotters, since countries and cities are not monolithic: Tokyo's Ginza district, for example, resembles SoHo in Manhattan more than Tokyo's business district. The obsession for spotting new tastes is pure Ortega. "We never go to fashion shows," says Loreta García, who joined Inditex 23 years ago, straight out of design school, and now heads Zara Woman's trends department. "We track bloggers and listen to customers, but we change our opinions all the time," she says. "What seems great today, in two weeks is the worst idea ever."
What keeps this machine ticking is the logistics department -- "the essence of the company," says Echevarria, who credits the system for such turnaround speeds in places as far-flung as Baku and Melbourne. At 400,000 square feet, the logistics building is more than three times the size of headquarters across the street, and is organized around a Rube Goldberg-style labyrinth of conveyer belts extending five stories high. It delivers customized orders to every Zara store on the planet. There is a firm 24-hour turnaround deadline for Europe, the Middle East, and much of the U.S., and 48 hours for Asia and Latin America.
MORE: Can the Lucky jean guys get lucky again?
The unusual arrangement is pure Ortega. Though he officially handed the reins to Pablo Isla in July 2011, Ortega remains the company's muse, inspiration, and biggest shareholder. Astonishingly, Ortega has never had an office. Even now, the world's third-richest man sits at a desk at the end of Zara Woman's open workspace. Ortega prefers touching fabrics to reading memos. "It's as though there are no computers," García says. "The directors are like that too now," she says. "We all started here young and have grown up with Ortega." Newer staff members say they are astonished at how often Ortega discusses colors and trends with them. "You can ask Ortega, 'What do you think of this?' It's very flexible," says García. "You don't have to fix an appointment." Asked what Ortega's legacy will be at Inditex, Isla, the CEO, answered similarly: "The entrepreneurial spirit, the self-criticism, the culture: The company is completely flat."
Ortega's insistence on staying close to home and his ability to connect with even low-level employees raise an intriguing question: Would his executive style have been more hierarchical and conventional -- and perhaps less successful -- had he emerged from a privileged family and with an MBA, rather than from dire poverty with little education? "Poverty clearly made him who he is," says Blanco, who wrote his unauthorized biography. "There was a hunger. Show me any great boxer who didn't come from this kind of background."

The floor of Zara's logistics building, where clothing arrives from Brazil, China, and India, only to be shipped back out in under 24 hours
In semiretirement, Ortega now lives in a five-story sea-facing house in La Coruña, on a busy city street, with little evident security. He eats breakfast every morning (eggs and fries, say friends) with acquaintances at La Coruña's businessmen's club, and retreats on weekends to his country house, where he raises chickens and goats and gathers his grown children. A creature of habit, Ortega devotes weeks a year to hiking pilgrimage routes in Galicia, and his lifelong aversion to flying keeps him from traveling much. Antonio Grandío Dopico, economics professor at the University of La Coruña, who has known Ortega since Inditex began, says his old friend's life philosophy is "absolute normality."
Yet these are not normal times in Spain. Youths in their twenties -- Zara's key market -- suffer unemployment rates of about 50%, double the national average. The country's economic pain is clear walking through La Coruña. The commercial artery has dozens of boarded-up storefronts. The one bright spot is a renovated building on a prized corner near the port, lit up and humming with action: the city's premier Zara store.
How long can Zara maintain its relentless expansion? With Europe's slowdown, the company expanded in the U.S. and Asia, with a splashy opening on Fifth Avenue last year, and in September launched Zara.com in China. As Zara expands farther from La Coruña, Ortega's rules might collide with the reality of shipping hundreds of thousands of garments a year back to Galicia for distribution.
Zara may change, but the man who built this retail giant will always be, deep down, a small-town hero. Once, when traveling to a store opening in Manhattan, Ortega watched as shoppers poured through the doors. He was so overcome he shut himself in a bathroom and wept. "No one could see the tears streaming down my face," he told O'Shea. "Can you imagine how I thought of my parents then? How proud they would have been of their son who had, so to speak, discovered America, starting from a little town lost in the sticks of northern Spain!"

Amazon Cloud Revenue Heads Higher as Google Plays Catch-Up: Tech



Computing supply chains being disrupted. Aivars Lode Avantce

Wire: Bloomberg News (BN) Date: Mar 7 2013  20:55:38
Amazon Cloud Revenue Heads Higher as Google Plays Catch-Up: Tech
 By Ari Levy
     March 8 (Bloomberg) -- Amazon.com Inc.’s Web Services
division, whose server farms generate the processing power the
retailer sells to heavy corporate data users on the cheap, has
grown so large that the unit routinely finds itself with
thousands of spare machines.
     So the e-commerce giant created a supply-and-demand-driven
market called Amazon EC2 Spot Instances that lets clients rent
processors for as little as 10 percent of Amazon’s standard
cloud-services fees. To use Spot Instances, companies bid for
the rights to a certain number of servers. Winning bidders are
billed by the hour, as long as the market price hasn’t risen
above an upper bound they specify.
     The marketplace gives Seattle-based Amazon and its 7-year-
old cloud-computing division an added advantage over Microsoft
Corp. and Google Inc., which are racing to catch up after a late
start. Analysts at Macquarie Securities estimated in a Jan. 7
report that total Amazon Web Services revenue will almost double
this year to $3.8 billion and will reach $8.8 billion by 2015.
Web Services will kick in close to 5 percent of sales this year,
up from 3.4 percent last year, and will rise to almost 8 percent
by 2015, Macquarie projected.
     Were AWS a standalone company, it would be worth $24
billion, according to a March 5 report by Carlos Kirjner, an
analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. That’s more valuable than
two-thirds of the companies in Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, and
accounts for about a fifth of Amazon’s stock market value.

                       Analyzing Terabytes

     Amazon’s lead in the public-cloud market, which Gartner
Inc. estimates jumped 20 percent last year to $109 billion,
poses a challenge for technology competitors. As an e-commerce
company, Amazon’s operating margins are already razor-thin -
-1.11 percent in 2012 -- while Google and Microsoft generated
margins last year of greater than 25 percent. That means Amazon
can cut prices on cloud services without affecting its total
profitability.
     Investors aren’t fazed by Amazon’s low margins. The stock
trades at 186 times estimated earnings for this year, compared
with a ratio of 18 for Google and 10 for Microsoft.
     Spot Instances was started in 2009, though the spot market
has taken off only in the past year, Amazon EC2 Vice President
Matt Garman said. Researchers in genomics and drug design as
well as online advertising increasingly use Spot to analyze
terabytes of data, while companies such as Cycle Computing LLC,
Princeton Consultants Inc., and Numerate Inc. have built
businesses that track market prices for heavy data users.

                         Spot Algorithms

     “We’re finally starting to see the real change in the
slope of adoption,” Garman said. While he declined to provide
specifics on how profitable the product is or how many customers
use it, the company says much of its increased spending on
“technology and content” went to add capacity for Amazon Web
Services.
     Princeton Consultants, a strategy and software firm, is
among the companies that developed algorithms to monitor Spot
Instances’ pricing and availability for clients in need of
server time. Chief Executive Officer Steve Sashihara said his
program, OptiSpotter, provides small hedge funds with the edge
they need to compete with investment banks and global funds in
the cutthroat world of high-frequency trading.
     “It’s completely game-changing” for clients to cut a
project’s processing costs from $100,000 to $10,000 and get
supercomputer-like processing power, Sashihara said. “A couple
guys with $50 million can be trading at high frequency and be
taking on Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.”

                           On Deadline

     One big catch limits the utility of Spot Instances: If
rising demand sends prices skyward, a customer must outbid the
higher price to keep its project running. Otherwise, Amazon
shuts their servers off in midstream. That’s a deal-breaker for
clients using it to host websites or stream video.
     “For people running with hard deadlines, it’s not an
appropriate solution,” said Michael Crandell, CEO of RightScale
Inc., which helps companies manage cloud services.
     Still, Crandell says he expects Spot Instances to keep
growing. As much as 15 percent of Amazon servers his customers
rent is now from Spot Instances, he says, up from the low single
digits in mid-2011.
     Julie Black joined Web-advertising startup TellApart Inc.
in 2011 as director of engineering after six years at Google.
She uses Spot Instances regularly, because her former employer’s
recently introduced cloud platform, Google Compute Engine,
doesn’t offer a comparably cheap market. Burlingame, California-
based TellApart analyzes online shoppers’ habits for retailers
such as Nordstrom Inc., One Kings Lane Inc., and CafePress Inc.

                         Faster, Cheaper

     To provide better results than its dozens of competitors,
TellApart uses Spot Instances to collate more than 10,000
queries per second from hundreds of millions of people, with the
bulk of the work occurring during off-peak hours when prices are
lower. Black said the company, backed by almost $18 million from
venture investors including Greylock Partners and Bain Capital
Ventures, rents hundreds of machines at a time. Its monthly
check to Amazon is about 75 percent less than it would be for
cloud servers at the on-demand price.
     “We process data faster and cheaper because we can use
more machines,” she said. “Everything we do relies upon this
core piece of technology.”

Expectations of online shoppers will shape global shipping, PepsiCo executve tells JaxPort conference


Logistics is being redefined by internet shopping. Aivars Lode Avantce


Expectations of online shoppers will shape global shipping, PepsiCo executve tells JaxPort conference
Posted: March 19, 2013 - 6:30pm
J
View this story on the All-Access Members site
By David Bauerlein
The “real time generation” of consumers who shop online and want their purchases shipped quickly to their homes will shape the global shipment of goods, a PepsiCo executive said Tuesday at conference sponsored by the Jacksonville Port Authority.
About 350 people attended the JaxPort Logistics and Intermodal Conference at Omni Amelia Island Plantation Resort. They came from 23 states and Puerto Rico, according to the port authority.
JaxPort stages the conference every other year, featuring panel discussions by industry leaders. The three-day conference also serves as a marketing event for JaxPort to tout Jacksonville as a gateway port and location for distribution centers.
John Philips, senior vice president of customer supply chain and logistics for PepsiCo, said in the keynote speech that Internet-based commerce is a “global megatrend” shaping the retail industry.
“You have to get your arms around the whole consumer technology,” he said.
Businesses that “master the convergence of the physical world and the digital world will become the market leaders,” he said.
He reeled off a slew of statistics about the rising importance of online shopping. To take one common product, he said that by 2015, about 20 percent of diapers will be purchased online.
He said shoppers also are interested in being able to customize their orders, which requires factories that are nimble and operate around the clock, seven days a week to fulfill orders in a timely way.
Even in brick-and-mortar stores, consumers are bringing their smart phones to shop around, and retailers who respond to that will get more sales, he said.
He said other global trends are the increasing flow of people into cities, the aging population, and the rising middle class in regions such as Asia.
The United States and Europe “will continue to chug along,” he said, “but the big growth is going to come from the other countries.”
David Bauerlein: (904) 359-4581

The 12 habits of highly collaborative organizations


The topic of collaboration is becoming more mainstream with more  articles being written about it. Aivars Lode Avantce


The 12 habits of highly collaborative organizations
By Guest Contributor
March 18, 2013, 6:12 AM PDT
Takeaway: Here are twelve collaboration patterns or “principles” that successful organizations follow.
Did you know that there are more possible moves in a game of chess then there are atoms in the entire universe and seconds that have elapsed since the big bang?  In fact, chess can be a virtually endless game.  If that’s the case then how do chess masters emerge?  What’s the point of trying to study something if the moves are endless?  Any good chess player will tell you that one of the keys to success is the ability to recognize patterns and situations to help you identify what the best next move is.
When looking at collaboration and the future of work, the same logic applies.  Every company is unique and no two collaboration initiatives are the same.  However, after working with, speaking with and researching hundreds of companies (such as Wells Fargo, Unisys, Lowe’s, IBM, EA, The U.S. Government, TELUS, Intuit, Shell, and many others) my team atChess Media Group and I have identified twelve collaboration patterns or “principles” that the successful organizations follow.  Below you will find a visual highlighting these principles followed by a more in-depth description of each one.
1.  Individual benefit is just as important as the overall corporate benefit (if not more important)
Don’t focus on the overall corporate value and benefit when communicating collaboration to employees.  Employees care about how this will impact them on an individual basis.  How will this make their jobs and lives easier?
2.  Strategy before technology
Before rushing to pick that shiny new collaboration platform focus on developing a strategy which will help you understand the “why” before the “how.”  This is crucial for the success of any collaboration initiative.  You don’t want to be in a position where you have deployed a technology without understanding why.  This can become a very costly mistake later.
3.  Listen to the voice of the employee
We are always so adamant about listening to the voice of the customer, what about the voice of the employee?  When going down the collaboration road within your enterprise it’s important to make employees a part of the decision making process from step one.  Listen to their ideas, their needs, and their suggestions and integrate their feedback in your technology and strategy.
4.  Learn to get out of the way
This is something Andrew McAfee (author of Enterprise 2.0 and co-author of Race Against the Machine) talks about quite frequently.  Learn to empower and support your employees and then get out of their way.  By trying to enforce and police everything you stifle collaboration within your organization.  Some best practices and guidelines are fine to have but let your employees do what they need to do.  Managers need to learn to follow from the front.
5.  Lead by example
If leaders at your organization don’t use and support collaborative tools and strategies then why should the employees?  Leaders are very powerful instruments to facilitate change and encourage desired behaviors. They must be visibly on board and this goes beyond just funding.
6.  Integrate into the flow of work
Collaboration should never be seen as an additional task or requirement for employees.  Instead collaboration should fit naturally into their flow of work.  For example instead of having employees use multiple usernames, passwords, and log-in sites; create a “front-door” to the enterprise accessed through your collaboration platform.
7.  Create a supportive environment
If your organization focuses on rewarding employees for individual performance as the main driver of success then it will become quite hard to encourage employees to share and communicate with each other.  Why would they want to?  We this quite often in financial services firms who promote employees to managerial roles such as VPs (and higher) simply because they brought in a lot of money.  There is nothing wrong with rewarding employees for great performance but it’s also crucial to reward and recognize teamwork and collaboration.  For example organizations can make a percentage of an employee’s bonus tied to how well they collaborate with their co-workers (some large enterprises are starting to experiment with this).  A supportive environment also means having training and education resources available for employees as well as evangelists within the organization.
8.  Measure what matters
There are a lot of things that an organization can measure but that doesn’t mean that all of these things should be measured.  Focus on the metrics that matter to your organization and the ones that are tied back to a business case.  Some organizations focus on “busy” metrics such as comments submitted or groups created.  Others focus on metrics such as engagement (defined as how connected and passionate an employee feels about the company and the work they do).
9.  Persistence
I believe that collaborative initiatives shouldn’t be pilots they should be corporate initiatives.  These efforts can certainly take time but if the organization makes the decision that collaboration is the direction they want to go down then that’s it.  No giving up and no turning back.  Moving forward, organizations cannot succeed without connecting their employees and their information.  Making collaboration work isn’t an option it’s THE option.
10. Adapt and evolve
It’s important to remember that collaboration is perpetual.  It’s a never ending evolution as new tools and strategies for the workplace continue to emerge.  This means that it’s important for your organization to be able to adapt and evolve as things change.  Keep a pulse on what’s going on in the industry and inside of your organization.  This will allow you to innovate and anticipate.
11. Employee collaboration also benefits the customer
While customer collaboration and employee collaboration do solve very different and unique problems, employee collaboration has tremendous value to your customers.  Employees are able to provide a better experience and superior support by being able to tap into internal experts, information, and resources which can be used to help customers.  Consider a customer that is working with a support representative who unfortunately does not know how to solve the customer’s problem.  The employee however has access to the entire organization to find the right information and share it with the customer.
12. Collaboration can make the world a better place
Perhaps the most important principle of collaboration is that it can make the world a better place.  Sure, collaboration can make our employee more productive and benefit our customers.  But collaboration also allows employees to feel more connected to their jobs and co-workers, reduces stress at the workplace, makes their jobs easier, allows for more work freedom, and in general makes them happier people.  This means less stress at home, less arguments with spouses, and more time to spend with loved ones.  Collaboration not only positively impacts the lives of employees at work but also at home.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Meet Amancio Ortega: The third-richest man in the world


The third richest man in the world who you will not have heard of attributes his logistics department as the essence of his business  Aivars Lode Avantce


Meet Amancio Ortega: The third-richest man in the world
January 8, 2013: 5:00 AM ET
After Gates and Slim comes Amancio Ortega, who built the world's largest fashion empire, Zara. He's difficult to know, impossible to interview, and incredibly secretive. An exclusive portrait.
By Vivienne Walt, contributor

Zara founder Amancio Ortega
FORTUNE -- The motorbike roared up to the traffic light in La Coruña in northern Spain and stopped alongside a black Town Car. From inside, the passenger glanced out his window and saw the young biker leaning over the handlebars, jean jacket decorated with appliquéd patches, a throwback to the 1970s. The man in the car, decades older than the biker, zoomed in on the jacket. The old man grabbed his cellphone and, as the story goes, called an aide in his office. His eyes still fixed on the biker, the man described the jacket's stitching, its shape and color, and signed off with a single instruction: "¡Hácedla!" Make it.
The light turned green, the biker pulled away; unbeknown to him, he and his jacket had just played a walk-on role in one of the greatest retail stories of our time.
Amancio Ortega Gaona -- the man inside the car -- is the third-richest man on earth. In this provincial corner of Galicia, on Spain's windswept northwestern coastline, the 76-year-old founder of the Inditex Group has spent years secluded from public view, all while living in the middle of La Coruña, a city of 246,000 people. Among the millions of shoppers who patronize Inditex's flagship brand, Zara, and have made Ortega unfathomably rich, few have even heard his name. Ortega has made sure of that, shunning social appearances and refusing all interview requests (including for this article). Until 1999 no photograph of Ortega had ever been published.
MORE: Will.i.am: Corporate America's hit machine
And yet, a world away from the glitz of Paris, Milan, and New York, Ortega has built a fashion empire that reaches into more than 80 countries. Beginning 40 years ago, Ortega ripped up the business model that had been refined over decades by Europe's fashion houses and replaced it with one of the most brutally fast turnaround schedules the industry had ever attempted. Decades later Zara is the world's biggest fashion retailer.
Ortega built his empire on two basic rules: Give customers what they want, and get it to them faster than anyone else. The twin organizing principles have made the company (and Ortega) into an unlikely iconoclast, more of an optimal supply chain than a traditional retailer. They are also the secret to Inditex's astonishing success. "Very few companies can challenge Inditex at this time. The company is in a race with themselves rather than anything else," says Christodoulos Chaviaras, a retail analyst at Barclays Capital in London. Tadashi Yanai, founder of clothing retailer Uniqlo, has made it his stated goal in life to beat Zara. And last August shares of the fashion company Esprit rose 28% on the day it announced its new CEO, Inditex's former distribution and operations manager.

Humble beginnings: Ortega grew up in a row house in La Coruña, in northern Spain (top); his first job was in retail, at Gala (left), where current owner José Martínez (right) was his friend.
Spain might be suffering through its worst recession in generations, with 24% unemployment and crippling debt, but within Inditex, the crisis might as well be happening on Mars. "They live in a different world," says Modesto Lomba, president of the Spanish Association of Fashion Designers. In December, CEO Pablo Isla announced that revenue was up 17% year on year for the first three quarters of 2012 -- that nine-month sales revenue amounts to $14.6 billion -- and net profits matched 2010's, at $2.71 billion. So far, the growth shows no signs of slowing.
Inditex produced 835,000 garments in 2011. A new Zara store opens every day, on average; Inditex's 6,000th store just launched on London's Oxford Street. There are 46 Zara stores in the U.S., 347 in China, and 1,938 in Spain. Ortega controls more than 59% of the company's shares, and last July he overtook Warren Buffett to become the world's third-richest man, behind Carlos Slim Helú and Bill Gates. The reclusive, enigmatic Spaniard, hunting for ideas from his car window on the streets of his hometown, is now worth about $56 billion.
MORE: Jeff Bezos' fashion foray
If such a fortune seems big, it is even more astonishing when you consider the man himself. The youngest of four children, Ortega was born in Busdongo de Arbas, a hamlet of 60 people in northern Spain, in 1936, just as the Spanish Civil War was erupting. The family scraped by on his father's railway job while his mother worked as a housemaid. When Amancio was a small boy, the family moved to La Coruña. There, home was a row house that abutted the train tracks and that served, as it still does today, as the railway workers' quarters. Amancio might have joined the rail service too, had it not been for one fateful evening when he was just 13. Walking home from his school, he and his mother stopped at a local store, where he stood by as his mother pleaded for credit. "He heard someone say, 'Señora, I cannot give this to you. You have to pay for it,'" says Covadonga O'Shea, a longtime friend of Ortega's who runs a fashion business school at the University of Navarra in Madrid and wrote the sole authorized biography of him, The Man From Zara. "He felt so humiliated, he decided he would never go back to school."
Barely in his teens, Ortega found a job as a shop hand for a local shirtmaker called Gala, which still sits on the same corner in downtown La Coruña. Today the store feels frozen in time: plaid shirts, fishermen's caps, and woolen cardigans. "Can you believe it?" says Xabier R. Blanco, a local journalist who tracks Ortega's career. "They still sell the same stuff, and Amancio is Mr. World." That painful irony is not lost on Gala's owner, José Martínez, 76, who inherited the store from his father. He befriended young Amancio when they were both 14. The boys spent their afternoons folding shirts at Gala and riding bikes around town. Martínez does not relish his current role as counterpoint to his childhood friend. "No one ever comes in here to buy anything," he says. "They just want to know about Amancio."

By 16, Ortega had concluded that the real money could be made giving customers exactly what they wanted, quickly, rather than buying up inventory in the hopes it would sell. To do that, he needed to figure out what people were looking for, then make it. He would need to control the supply chain. Ortega had the ideal environment: Galicia. With few job opportunities, thousands of men worked at sea, leaving their women to struggle alone back home. "The women would do anything for a little money, and they were really good at sewing," says Blanco, who co-wrote a book called Amancio Ortega: From Zero to Zara. Ortega began organizing thousands of women into sewing cooperatives. He oversaw a thriving production of quilted bathrobes for his first company, GOA. Mercedes López was 14 when she went to work for Ortega and says most women were thrilled to be hired. "The conditions were really pretty good," says López, now 52, who is the textile union representative at Inditex. "We knew Amancio well. He was very close to the workers." It was a family business: Ortega ran design, his brother Antonio headed the commercial side, and his sister Josefa was the bookkeeper. The company trucked in textiles from Barcelona, cutting out the middlemen.
With enough cash, Ortega opened his first storefront in 1975, two blocks from his teenage job at Gala. He named it Zara, because his preferred name, Zorba, was taken. From the outset, Ortega made speed the driving force. Decades later it still is. Zara stores refresh their stock twice a week and receive orders within 48 hours, tops. Ortega imposed the 48-hour rule in the 1970s, forcing him to open the first Zara stores near La Coruña. Many lined the well-traveled truck route to Barcelona's textile factories. Even as the company grew, Ortega stuck to his two rules.
MORE: Turning fashion video into a money-maker
It took Ortega 10 years to found the holding company, Inditex, and open his first international store in Portugal -- whose labor force, cheaper than Spain's, made it the next obvious place to produce; New York and Paris followed in the late 1980s. While Zara proliferated across Europe through the 1990s, much of the production was kept close to home. "Our roots have always been in manufacturing," says Jesús Echevarria Hernández, Inditex's spokesman, sitting in the company's sprawling headquarters in Arteixo, outside La Coruña, with floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking farmland. "When we come here, we always refer to it as 'going to the factory.'"
The factory is part sci-fi machine, part old-fashioned retail -- a well-oiled operation organized around Ortega's twin principles. It is restocking continually at top speed. Inside, its high-gloss, white, minimalist interiors resemble a humongous Zara store. Along two arteries down the main floor, hundreds of designers and sales analysts work at long white counters in a vast open space, grouped around regions of Zara's empire. The pace is frantic: Designers create about three items a day, and patternmakers cut one sample from each. Seated alongside them are commercial-sales specialists, each with regional expertise, who dissect tastes and customer habits using sales reports from Zara store managers to see what's selling and (more telling) what customers are looking for. Staffers say inspiration comes from the streets, clubs, bars, and restaurants. Each is trained to keep an eye on what people are wearing, just as Ortega has done for decades.

The billionare now: As the semiretired founder of Zara, Ortega lives out of a seaside multibuilding residence; he and his daughter enjoy horseracing; a Zara store in his hometown.
At one end of the Zara design floor is a small team that manages Zara.com. There, flat-screen monitors linked by webcam to offices in Shanghai, Tokyo, and New York act as trendspotters, since countries and cities are not monolithic: Tokyo's Ginza district, for example, resembles SoHo in Manhattan more than Tokyo's business district. The obsession for spotting new tastes is pure Ortega. "We never go to fashion shows," says Loreta García, who joined Inditex 23 years ago, straight out of design school, and now heads Zara Woman's trends department. "We track bloggers and listen to customers, but we change our opinions all the time," she says. "What seems great today, in two weeks is the worst idea ever."
What keeps this machine ticking is the logistics department -- "the essence of the company," says Echevarria, who credits the system for such turnaround speeds in places as far-flung as Baku and Melbourne. At 400,000 square feet, the logistics building is more than three times the size of headquarters across the street, and is organized around a Rube Goldberg-style labyrinth of conveyer belts extending five stories high. It delivers customized orders to every Zara store on the planet. There is a firm 24-hour turnaround deadline for Europe, the Middle East, and much of the U.S., and 48 hours for Asia and Latin America.
MORE: Can the Lucky jean guys get lucky again?
The unusual arrangement is pure Ortega. Though he officially handed the reins to Pablo Isla in July 2011, Ortega remains the company's muse, inspiration, and biggest shareholder. Astonishingly, Ortega has never had an office. Even now, the world's third-richest man sits at a desk at the end of Zara Woman's open workspace. Ortega prefers touching fabrics to reading memos. "It's as though there are no computers," García says. "The directors are like that too now," she says. "We all started here young and have grown up with Ortega." Newer staff members say they are astonished at how often Ortega discusses colors and trends with them. "You can ask Ortega, 'What do you think of this?' It's very flexible," says García. "You don't have to fix an appointment." Asked what Ortega's legacy will be at Inditex, Isla, the CEO, answered similarly: "The entrepreneurial spirit, the self-criticism, the culture: The company is completely flat."
Ortega's insistence on staying close to home and his ability to connect with even low-level employees raise an intriguing question: Would his executive style have been more hierarchical and conventional -- and perhaps less successful -- had he emerged from a privileged family and with an MBA, rather than from dire poverty with little education? "Poverty clearly made him who he is," says Blanco, who wrote his unauthorized biography. "There was a hunger. Show me any great boxer who didn't come from this kind of background."

The floor of Zara's logistics building, where clothing arrives from Brazil, China, and India, only to be shipped back out in under 24 hours
In semiretirement, Ortega now lives in a five-story sea-facing house in La Coruña, on a busy city street, with little evident security. He eats breakfast every morning (eggs and fries, say friends) with acquaintances at La Coruña's businessmen's club, and retreats on weekends to his country house, where he raises chickens and goats and gathers his grown children. A creature of habit, Ortega devotes weeks a year to hiking pilgrimage routes in Galicia, and his lifelong aversion to flying keeps him from traveling much. Antonio Grandío Dopico, economics professor at the University of La Coruña, who has known Ortega since Inditex began, says his old friend's life philosophy is "absolute normality."
Yet these are not normal times in Spain. Youths in their twenties -- Zara's key market -- suffer unemployment rates of about 50%, double the national average. The country's economic pain is clear walking through La Coruña. The commercial artery has dozens of boarded-up storefronts. The one bright spot is a renovated building on a prized corner near the port, lit up and humming with action: the city's premier Zara store.
How long can Zara maintain its relentless expansion? With Europe's slowdown, the company expanded in the U.S. and Asia, with a splashy opening on Fifth Avenue last year, and in September launched Zara.com in China. As Zara expands farther from La Coruña, Ortega's rules might collide with the reality of shipping hundreds of thousands of garments a year back to Galicia for distribution.
Zara may change, but the man who built this retail giant will always be, deep down, a small-town hero. Once, when traveling to a store opening in Manhattan, Ortega watched as shoppers poured through the doors. He was so overcome he shut himself in a bathroom and wept. "No one could see the tears streaming down my face," he told O'Shea. "Can you imagine how I thought of my parents then? How proud they would have been of their son who had, so to speak, discovered America, starting from a little town lost in the sticks of northern Spain!"
This story is from the January 14, 2013 issue of Fortune.